MOM of 7

….life AMPLIFIED by 7 kids!

Why The Bachelor Makes Good TV-Watching But Very Bad Matchmaking 04/27/2011

Why The Bachelor Makes Good TV-Watching But Very Bad Matchmaking

Admission: so, on one level, I can totally get behind the whole concept of The Bachelor. There’s no one perfect person out there for any of us: why not choose from a selection of twenty-five telegenic types within your range of age and attractiveness and pick one as a fiancée? And why not broadcast the whole thing for an audience of millions, with someone else responsible for your wardrobe, makeup and maybe some dialogue?

Okay, don’t answer that.

All I’m saying is that in theory, it’s not such a terrible idea. But in practice, the formula ain’t working so well. In fifteen seasons, the show has produced exactly one wedding. The latest disappointment is Brad Womack: an Austin bar owner who returned for his second tour after famously declining to give anyone that fatal “final rose” the first time around. This season he did: to Emily Maynard. I know their demise isn’t quite official, but when one half of a celebrity couple publicly admits things aren’t going so well, you might as well consider the divorce papers signed.

So what’s the problem? How come The Bachelor producers can make such compelling television — close to fifteen million viewers tuned in to the latest finale — but can’t find Brad Womack a wife?

A few weeks ago I went to a party with my boyfriend, and noticed him talking to an attractive woman. One thing I appreciate about my boyfriend is that he is an exceptional conversationalist: he can talk to just about anyone. One thing I don’t always appreciate is that “just about anyone” sometimes includes attractive women.

“I don’t care if you talk to her,” I told him when we next got a moment alone, apropos of nothing besides my own internal monologue. Desperately, I tried to play the role of Not Ever Jealous, Completely Confident Girlfriend. “You can make out with her if you want, I don’t care, whatever.”

Apparently my performance was less than convincing.

“You don’t mean that,” he replied, guilting me into matching his candor: “Okay fine, you’re right, I don’t.”

In other words, I — like many emotive humans — get uncomfortably, absurdly jealous for literally no reason. So I can only imagine the predicament of those Bachelor couples: for whom the early stages of commitment are punctuated by regularly televised images of half the pair making out with someone else.

“Monday nights became a nightmare for them,” a friend of Emily’s told Life & Style magazine — that reliable resource of all things essential and important. Shocking that Emily found it difficult to watch her fiancee profess (and display) his affections for a dozen-plus other women on a weekly basis. Who in god’s name wants to watch their significant other being intimate with someone else? It’s bad enough to know, intellectually, that our partners have had others. But to have to see it? In full, two-dimensional color? With commercials? I’d sooner spend six weeks in Los Angeles freeway traffic than be subjected to such a thing.

Who knows why Brad and Emily are breaking up, if they in fact even are. Who knows why any of reality television‘s marriages have failed or fizzled; all relationships, even those regularly splashed on magazine covers, maintain their own sort of mystery. I can imagine lots of potential reasons.

But I wouldn’t be surprised if that was one. We all know that our significant others have, in their lifetimes, been attracted to other people. But, for the rest of us, it’s a whole lot easier to pretend that they haven’t.

Follow Elizabeth Tannen on Twitterwww.twitter.com/ertannen

 

American Idol….BEEP BEEP BEEP: Steven Tyler’s “bombs” 04/21/2011

Wow!  Did you see last night.  A lot of interesting stuff going on.

Poor Jacob —his track issues in his ear

Poor Steven Tyler—-getting BEEPed all the time.  Oh wait, that’s because he was dropping the F bombs.  Soon after it happened, FOX Execs had the 63 year-old rocker surrounded.

Read On:

American Idol‘: Steven Tyler’s F-bomb and Jacob Lusk’s musical snafu, on the scene of Top 7 performance night

Of the many, many,many differences between Season 10 and Season 9 ofAmerican Idol, one of the most striking to me is how suddenly we’re all deeply interested in the dating lives of the contestants this year. As I made my way to my seat in the Idoldome last night, I overheard one woman say with great concern and earnestness, “I just don’t knowhow he met Nikki Reed.” And the two women with pleasant perfume seated next to me — one a big Haley fan, the other a big Casey fan, with the clear impression that there was a heated debate over glasses of Chardonnay about who was better — were all too happy to point out to me that Dancing With the Stars pro Mark Ballas and his father Corky were both seated in the front row in “very dapper” looking suits. You may notice that I haven’t pointed out why Nikki Reed and Mark Ballas hold any importance to the Idol Nation, and if you yourself don’t know already, then please do spend some time today treating yourself to a congratulatory cupcake or mall massage for managing to keep this knowledge from setting root in your brain. The rest of us will be madly parsing next week’s DWTS results show for body language clues while fooling ourselves into thinking it has something to do with learning about the national debt ceiling.

Ballas seemed to realize that his mere presence inside the Idoldome was winning him a whole lot of (perhaps unwanted) attention. Before the show, he buried himself in his iPhone, barely looking up at all; his father Corky, on the other hand, grinned and took in the scene like a man who had worked at a Six Flags for the last decade and had suddenly found himself in the heart of Disney World. When Cory launched into the “get the entire audience ‘dancing’ by asking them to shift their heads from side-to-side” portion of his warm up routine, the elder Ballas happily played along; the younger Ballas, kinda hilariously, stood stone still, refusing to move at all. If Cory had had the stones to pull Mark Ballas on stage and commanded him, as per usual, to “shake that booty,” I daresay at least one or two audience members would’ve spontaneously combusted.

Alas, Cory did not have said stones, which is just as well given all the wild goings on inside the Idoldome last night. Here are the highlights:

“They are killing it,” said Jennifer Lopez in the taped opening. “Yes, they are,” said the nice-smelling woman to my left. (The Haley fan, not the Casey fan.)

Ladies and gentlemen, your Bottom 6! The crowd had an inkling of what was in store when Cory told us before the show that “all the Top 13 will be on the stage” for what he promised was a “super high-energy, high-impact group number.” Cory did not, however, give us a heads up that Pia Toscano would be wearing a near backless top that, had she worn it on the show, would have safely kept her around at least long enough for her to have watched Mark and Chelsea dance to “Party in the U.S.A.” this week from one of the Idol green rooms at CBS Television City. (Mark’s father kept looking at him during the group number, and Smirkelstiltskin, my snark demon, is convinced he kept saying to his son, “Look! She’s wearing fringe! Look!” Oh, dads.) Cory also gave us no indication that Paul McDonald would be lucky if he correctly sang one out of every three words in the song. But as Idol vocal coach Debra Byrd pointed out to me later that night when I interviewed her for our Idol coaches column, the poor guy had just finished a bi-coastal press tour and likely barely had enough functioning grey matter to realize he was still wearing the same suit from last week. (Byrd didn’t say that last part, Smirkel did, but we were all thinking it.)

J.Lo goes negative! If you want a good indication for when Jennifer Lopez is about to give a less-than-glowing critique, sit behind her during the show and note when she is swaying her knees back and forth something fierce. Her note to Scotty that maybe a John Anderson song from 1983 recently re-recorded by LeAnn Rimes wasn’t the best song choice caused both women sitting next to me (the Haley fan and the Casey fan) to become suddenly, vocally beside themselves. In a way, it was heartening to see something bring these two feuding friends back together.

Example 56,329 on the difference between live audio and televised audio on American IdolThere was pretty much nothing about James’ performance of Muse’s “Uprising” that didn’t work like gangbusters inside the Idoldome, especially, yes, how it sounded. In the studio, the Durbs’ mic was evenly mixed in with the band and backup singers, and it was a pretty much perfect sonic marriage. On TV, his mic was, as always, far more forward in the audio mix, which is simply not how that kind of performance is best heard — which is to say, the judges did hear a different performance than you did. Anyhoo, after the number, James hung around to do his post-performance interview, which Cory interrupted with his usual ad-break audience banter. So James did two more takes of the same interview, turning back to get the audience’s response with increasing enthusiasm. The production ended up using the first take anyway. Ah, showbiz.

Randy’s advice to Haley Just before Haley was set to perform, she looked back at the judge sitting right behind her; Randy leaned forward and said, “Have fun, man.” Then the video package played in which it was quite clear that Jimmy Iovine did not want Haley to bring thefun to Adele’s megahit break-up anthem. Oh, Randy, is there any sound advice youcan’t contradict?

The power of free $#*!: After Haley performed, as is becoming Cory’s custom, he started handing out Haley-centric swag. At some point, however, he procured what I believe was a small handful of Scotty t-shirts, and asked who wanted one, pointing to a family with a small girl in a cute dress up in the back balcony. As Cory pointed, about a row down from me in the front section, a woman — a grown woman, a grown woman who looked like a soccer mom who’d put on her fancy off-shoulder spangly top because she was going to Idol — began leaping up down, saying full-voice, “Is it me? Is it ME?!” It wasn’t. Undeterred, the woman brandished her sign, with the indiscriminate slogan “We [heart] you!” Still nothing. When it turned out the aforementioned little girl had the same name, Mya, as another girl who’d just won a Haley t-shirt, Cory asked the audience, “Who else here is named Mya?” Immediately, the grown woman surged to her feet and screamed, “I AM!” She wasn’t.

The mystery of Jacob’s botched cue: On TV, it looked like Jacob was perhaps overcome with emotion at the outset of “Dance with My Father”; but, for what it’s worth, it was clear to everyone in the studio that something had gone seriously wrong musically. As Jacob began singing, the strings section situated behind Jacob began plunking to a drum beat at odds with the song; mere seconds later, the strings and pretty much the whole band stopped playing at all, save for a piano emphatically delivering the song’s melody line. Finally, for a brief second, Jacob stopped singing and shot a quick glance at band director Ray Chew — as if to say “what the heck is going on?” — and the air kinda left the room. But Jacob soldiered on, and when he hit the chorus, the audience spontaneously began applauding him, pretty much willing him to make it through.

Casey isn’t quite the devil he seems to be: Thanks to the camera angle, it appeared as though J.Lo was turning away from Casey when he sang his final notes mere inches from her face. She was, in fact, playing along, turning one ear towards him as if to say, “Whisper it to me, baby.” Boy, did he.

F-bomb fallout: Yes, if it wasn’t abundantly clear already, Steven Tyler said “f—ing” on live TV (except without the dashes). It was also abundantly clear that all those times when Tyler had been bleeped before on the show were false alarms, given the reaction by pretty much everyone within earshot of Tyler last night — especially exec producer Nigel Lythgoe, who spent a good 30 seconds standing with his hand buried into his hair. Eventually he, Fox reality TV head Mike Darnell, and Fox TV chairman Peter Rice, the big boss man himself, made their way over to the judges table, practically surrounding Steven. But everyone was, at least outwardly, all smiles. Rice and Tyler even hugged it out, although Rice did then appear to have a more serious conversation with Tyler while a make-up artist touched up the lip marks on his left cheek. (Tyler‘s left cheek, I mean.) Eventually, Nigel began calling for a piece of gaffing tape to put on Steven’s mouth; when it arrived, Nigel deadened the adhesive by rubbing it on his shirt a few times. Those lips must be protected from harm, even if they do occasionally dangle six-figure FCC fines over Rupert Murdoch’s head.

How many times can James twirl Stefano during the final credits? One? Two? How about four? Yes, four. I mean, if you were going to twirl Stefano, wouldn’t you go for at least three? That’s a silly question — of course you would.

 

Emily and Brad: Reportedly (drum roll please) OVER! 04/20/2011

http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/brad-womack-and-emily-maynard-relationship-reportedly-over–12205.php


Brad Womack and Emily Maynard have reportedly split.

Maynard — whom Womack proposed to and selected over Chantal O’Brien in the finale broadcast of The Bachelor‘s fifteenth season — ended her relationship with her fiance over the phone during the weekend of April 9, Life & Stylereported Tuesday.

(more…)

 

Let Me OUT Of The Snow-Globe! (or at least stop shaking it)

I’m stressed.

I’m feeling unorganized.

I don’t see the plan.

And when you put those three things together, I feel like I’m in one of those tiny Christmas Snow-Globes and someone is shaking the crap out of it.  You know the kind…the cute decorative globes that are full of snow…you shake, you turn upside down and the pretty snow falls inside the globe.

Pretty, yes!  But imagine being INSIDE the globe and it’s upside down, being shaken side to side.  Probably doesn’t feel so great, right?  

The VanCamp tribe just got bigger.  (and you were thinking that wasn’t possible)

We went to adopt a puppy and ended up adopting a 2 year old hound mix, and 2 sister puppies that are 3 months old and are black lab/border collie mixes.

CRAZY!

Went for one.  Ended up with 3!

I’m not sure I can say there’s any logic to our decision.  Can’t say that we thought this totally through, can’t say that it makes sense.  I can tell you that I wanted to do this, I wanted my husband and kids to be happy and in the process my husband fell in love with the two puppies and MOM of 7 fell in love with the 2 year old hound.

On Sunday, we brought home the 2 year old hound, Duke.  He’s settled in rather nicely. Tonight, however, the SNOW GLOBE SHAKING is going to be intense because Stephen is bringing home the twin puppies.

My blood pressure and pulse is probably rather high.  I’m not ready.  I feel anxious.  I’m worried.  I have NO CLUE what to expect.   Gesh, it was easier giving birth to my twins.  WHY is this such a hard transition for me?  Why am I letting this be such a hard transition for me?

You see, in the last three days I’ve learned more about myself than I have in 39 years.

Sadly, this is what I’ve realized:

1.  I have control over NOTHING!

2.  As much as I plan, I have 7 kids (outnumbered!!!) that may not follow MY plan.

3.  Repeat #1….I have control over NOTHING!  NOTHING!  NOTHING!

I’ve lived my life controlling situations, events, and frankly PEOPLE.  Sorry…it’s the truth.  I’m a fixer.  I’m a doer.  I’m a manager.  I come up with plans, and I get people around me (personally and professionally) to buy into this plan and execute it for me/with me.

When I was at my peek professionally, I was managing over 30 people executing plans left and right….I was WINNING (thank you Charlie Sheen). And this is when I felt the most alive and secure—when I had people around me buying into my plan and helping me execute it.

Now, I no longer have “that” job.  Now I negotiate million-dollar contracts. For the most part, however, I’m still getting people to buy-into MY terms of the contract.  So I still have “control” over the situation.

Once I step out the double doors at work, I lose all sense of control.  I drive 20 minutes home and the entire way, I feel my stomach churn because I realize I’m walking into a situation (home) where I have virtually no control.

NO!  I’m not saying that my kids rule the house.  I’m not saying I’m not the alpha dominant (along with Dad of 7) one in my house.  I’m not saying that there aren’t any rules/regulations/expectations in my house.  But let’s get real….it’s NOT a controlled environment.

Kids may not have done their chores.

Kids may have plans they didn’t consult with you about.

Kids may have broken something.

Kids may (shocking) disagree with you.

Kids may (shocking) push back on your plan.

Does any of this sound familiar?  Does any of this sound like YOUR life?  

WE TRULY HAVE CONTROL OVER…….NOTHING!  NADA!  ZIPPO!

So, do you have any coping strategies YOU would like share?  Cuz right now, I’m STUCK IN THE FREAKIN’ SNOW GLOBE and I certainly can’t see through all the snow and shaking it making my stomach feel really upset!  

 

If I added 2 cups to my bra size….well, the girls would have their own ZIP CODE! 04/19/2011

Victoria’s Secret Miraculous Bra: Does It Really Add Two Cup Sizes?

Step aside, Robin Roberts — we have a new girl crush on “Good Morning America” contributor Becky Worley who confessed that when she sits at home, watching Victoria’s Secret commercials, she thinks, “Really? Really?” OMGee, us too!

Worley decided to give the brand’s new Miraculous (push-up) Bra a whirl. The adverts claim that the piece of lingerie will bump you up two cup sizes. And indeed it did: Becky went from a 36A to 36C in no time flat. She even joked while exiting the fitting room, “They came out before me,” meaning her “girls.”

Becky, can we please hang out later?

What do you think?

Want to see the proof?  Check out how Good Morning America put the product to the test.  CLICK BELOW!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/19/victorias-secret-miraculous-bra_n_850877.html

 

So If Barbie Was Real…… 04/08/2011

Some people have skeletons in their closet. I have an enormous Barbie in mine.

She stands about six feet tall with a 39″ bust, 18″ waist, and 33″ hips. These are the supposed measurements of Barbie if she were a real person. I built her as a part of the first National Eating Disorder Awareness Week (NEDAW) at my high school, later introducing her to Hamilton College during its first NEDAW in 2011.

When I was a little girl, I played with my Barbie in her playhouse, sending her and Ken on dates that always ended with a goodnight kiss. I had fond times with my Barbie, and I admired her perfect blonde locks and slim figure. Barbie represented beauty, perfection and the ideal for young girls around the world. At least, as a seven-year-old, that is what she was to me.

In January 2007, I was looking for a way to make my peers realize the importance of eating disorders and body image issues. I was frustrated after quitting the cheerleading squad, frustrated with pressures to look and act a certain way and most of all frustrated with the eating disorder controlling my life. I wanted to do something that would turn others’ apathy into action. That evening, my neighbor and I found two long pieces of wood and started measuring. With a little math, nails and hammering, we built a stick figure that stood about six feet tall.

The chicken wire came next. Surrounding her wooden frame, we created a body that wasn’t much thicker than a stick figure, but had the womanly and unattainable curves and proportions that impressionable young girls idealize. We stuffed the chicken wire with newspaper and created a body that creepily leaned against the wall in my neighbor’s basement. She now needed some skin, so I brought her back to my apartment and employed the masterful art of papier maché.

Taking stacks of newspaper, glue and water, I skipped my high school semi-formal dance to give my girl some skin. Oddly, I started to feel my fondness for Barbie return, now not as a plaything but as a tool to reveal the negative body image that she promotes. As I papier machéd, I couldn’t forget Barbie’s impressive bust and blew up balloons over and over again to achieve a perfect 39″ measurement. Once her chest was secured, I spent hours dipping and smoothing the paper, and later mixed paints to replicate her seemingly perfect white skin tone. With a little hard work and a lot of time, a headless, footless and handless body soon stood in my apartment.

But it was then I became stumped. I couldn’t figure out how to recreate the recognizable face of the Barbie we all know and love. With NEDAW just around the corner, I was panicked. On my way to get office supplies, I drove by a Toys ‘R’ Us, and that’s when it hit me. Remember that Barbie with just shoulders and a head, meant for you to practice brushing her hair? I confidently walked into the toy store for the first time since I was a kid. I found the Barbie head, found a friend to assemble that head, and clothed Barbie for her first debut.

I dressed Barbie in my old clothes. The skirt she still has on today is a reminder of who I once was. That skirt, a size double zero, used to slip off my waist when I was struggling with anorexia. I put it on Barbie to serve as a reminder that the way Barbie looks, the way I once looked, is not healthy and is not “normal,” whatever normal might mean. My Barbie’s role is simple. She grabs the attention of apathetic onlookers and makes them think and talk about an issue that thrives in silence. In the last four years, Barbie has surpassed my expectations, attracting attention and sparking conversation among listeners and readers across the nation.

Once a year, at the end of February, Barbie comes out of the closet to meet my friends, strangers, and those apathetic onlookers. During NEDAW, she reminds people that eating disorders and body image issues are serious and prevalent. Holding an awareness week in high school or college is just one way to get students to discuss these important issues. However, constant discussion and education is key to dealing with and overcoming eating disorders.

Despite her bizarre appearance, Barbie provides something that many advocacy efforts lack. She reminds of something we once loved, while showing us the absurdity of our obsession with perfection.

More “Get Real, Barbie” statistics:*

• There are two Barbie dolls sold every second in the world.
• The target market for Barbie doll sales is young girls ages 3-12 years of age.
• A girl usually has her first Barbie by age 3, and collects a total of seven dolls during her childhood.
• Over a billion dollars worth of Barbie dolls and accessories were sold in 1993, making this doll big business and one of the top 10 toys sold.
• If Barbie were an actual women, she would be 5’9″ tall, have a 39″ bust, an 18″ waist, 33″ hips and a size 3 shoe.
• Barbie calls this a “full figure” and likes her weight at 110 lbs.
• At 5’9″ tall and weighing 110 lbs, Barbie would have a BMI of 16.24 and fit the weight criteria for anorexia. She likely would not menstruate.
• If Barbie was a real woman, she’d have to walk on all fours due to her proportions.
• Slumber Party Barbie was introduced in 1965 and came with a bathroom scale permanently set at 110 lbs with a book entitled “How to Lose Weight” with directions inside stating simply “Don’t eat.”

For more information, call the South Shore Eating Disorders Collaborative at 508-230-1732 or visit the National Eating Disorders Association at http://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org.
* Source: Body Wars, Margo Maine, Ph.D., Gurze Books, 2000.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/galia-slayen/the-scary-reality-of-a-re_b_845239.html

 

04/05/2011

Cosmetic Surgery:  The Answer to BULLYING?!

Just seven years old, Samantha Shaw of Sturgis, S.D. is about to experience something very grown-up: she’s going to have cosmetic surgery.

It’s not because she has a serious facial deformity or a life-threatening medical condition. Samantha is having cosmetic surgery because she gets teased about her protruding ears.

“The kids at school always ask her about her ears, and sometimes adults can be worse,” said Cami Roselles, Samantha’s mother. “One lady walked up to her and said, ‘Oh my God, what happened to your ears?’”

When people ask, Samantha just tells them she was born that way, but Roselles said the questions really bother her daughter.

“She always asks me why people ask questions. She’s very sensitive, so it really does get to her.”

Samantha’s doctor thought her ear deformity would get better as she got older, but Roselles said nothing changed. After doing some research, she looked into a type of cosmetic procedure called otoplasty, more commonly known as “pinning back” the ears.

Samantha, who will have her otoplasty on April 5, isn’t the onlychild to undergo cosmetic surgery because of bullying. Statistics from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery show that the number of children and teens who get cosmetic surgery increased nearly 30 percent over the past decade. Experts believe an increase in bullying behavior is one reason for the upward trend.

Brian Donoghue, an 11-year-old from Long Island, N.Y., had the surgery last summer.

His mother, Valerie, said kids at school would often ask Brian why his prominent ears looked the way they did.

“He would turn it into a ‘Look what I can do with my ears’ sort of thing and he’d kind of fold up his ears. The kids thought it was funny,” said Donoghue.

But even though Brian was able to use a defense mechanism to fend off the taunts, his mother, who is an assistant principal at a high school on Long Island, said she’s seen the effects of bullying and didn’t want her son to go through that.

Experts say bullying can cause problems like depression in victims, and eventually, bullied children may start to lash out, feel depressed, and have academic difficulties.

“If we had gone much longer, we might have started to see some of those other behaviors,” said Donoghue.

Dr. Frederick Lukash, the plastic surgeon who handled Brian’s case, said he could tell from drawings Brian did that he was tormented by the teasing.

“His drawings showed exaggerated ears while other kids had normal ears. I could tell there were some deep-seated issues,” Lukash said.

Before doing surgery on a child, Lukash said most surgeons will talk to the child during multiple consultations to find out how the child feels, and how he or she interacts with peers. He encourages them to draw pictures. In many cases, like Brian’s, it’s clear children are upset by constant teasing.

As kids get older, teasing can take a turn for the worse and turn into bullying. In the age of social media and the Internet, parents say it’s reached a new level.

“Bullying is very different now with Facebook and sites like that,” said Donoghue. “I didn’t want him to go through that.”

But other experts say doing plastic surgery on a child sends the wrong message.

“Changing appearance is not the solution,” said Cheryl Rode, director of clinical operations at the San Diego Center for Children. “We never want to hold the victim responsible for the bullying.”

Rode said the responsibility must lie with schools and other places where children are as well as with society.

“It is our responsibility on a national level, not the responsibility of parents of victims to make change happen.”

What Lies Ahead for Samantha

Roselles said she decided to go through with the surgery because she’s worried the teasing may turn into more serious bullying.

“Having it done now is probably the best, instead of when she gets older and they make fun of her more.”

Otoplasty isn’t covered by insurance, though it used to be.

“If it’s not causing a functional problem, then it’s not covered,” said Lukash.

Otoplasty can cost between $5,000 and $10,000. That is more than Roselles could afford, so she reached an organization called the Little Baby Face Foundation. Surgeons working with the foundation operate for free on children with facial deformities, and the foundation covers other expenses, like Samantha’s trip to New York City.

Otoplasty is the most common cosmetic operation done on children. In addition to cleft lip or cleft palate surgery, it’s the only cosmetic procedure acceptable for young children.

Dr. Steven Pearlman, a facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon in New York, is scheduled to perform Samantha’s surgery.

“She’s going to have two related procedures. The general one is otoplasty for children whose ears stick out. We set back the ear and make it look more natural and normal,” Pearlman said.

The other procedure will be on her right ear, which is folded over. That condition is called lop ear. Both surgeries have a high success rate.

“The ideal age is about six years old,” said Pearlman. “The ear is 90 percent of adult size, so we can operate successfully and a child is old enough to understand why the operation is important.”

Samantha said she is nervous about having surgery, but excited about her trip to the Big Apple. She’s also excited about doing things many little girls her age get to do.

“She wants to wear her hair like other girls in her class do,” said Roselles, “and she wants to get her ears pierced.”

 

 

 

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/cosmetic-surgery-answer-bullying/story?id=13255540

 

Would YOU wear your wedding ring if your spouse did not? 04/01/2011

It seems like every day we get another tidbit of info about the upcoming Royal Wedding. The latest: A spokeswoman from the palace dished to Peoplemagazine today that although Kate Middleton will wear a band made from Welsh gold, “there is only going to be one ring, in accordance with the couple’s wishes.”

As it turns out, a prince opting out of wedding band-wear isn’t all that rare. Prince Charles didn’t wear one when he married Diana (although we all know how thatturned out). And in other society or royal weddings, it’s common for there to be just one ring. (more…)

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: